← Back to VTS Methodology
VTS Scoring Log

Verified Peptides

US-facing gray market· Lyophilized vials, powders· Scored July 2026· verifiedpeptides.com →

Verified Peptides scores highest in the current catalog on the strength of its public COA archive - 500+ third-party test results publicly accessible and independently verifiable with the issuing lab. Testing practice predates the company's 2020 launch date, with documented results going back to 2019. The score reflects a genuine gap in one area: COAs are browseable by compound but not searchable by lot number, so tracing a specific vial to its exact result requires manual lookup rather than a direct match.

80 /100
High Transparency
500+ published third-party COAs publicly viewable on a dedicated Lab Tests page, each verifiable with the testing lab. Founded 2020, testing since 2019. Multi-parameter testing: HPLC purity, sterility, endotoxin (LPS), and net peptide content. The strongest public COA footprint of any vendor scored to date. Primary gap: COA browsing is by product rather than searchable by lot number, and policy documentation could be more specific on quality incidents.
Dimension Scores
DimensionMaxNotesScore
Third-Party Testing Practice30Every batch sent to a third-party analytical testing lab. Testing covers HPLC (purity), net peptide content, sterility (bacterial and yeast), and endotoxin (LPS). GMP facility manufacturing. Testing initiated in 2019, before official launch in 2020. Each report is described as verifiable directly with the testing lab. Full-catalog coverage claimed. One of the more comprehensive multi-parameter testing programs publicly documented in this market.26/30
Batch Traceability & Verification20Lab reports are published on the Lab Tests page and each can be verified with the testing lab. However, the Lab Tests page is browseable by product category rather than searchable by lot number. A buyer cannot directly input the lot code from a vial and retrieve the matching COA. Verification requires navigating to the correct product's reports and cross-referencing manually. Strong publication infrastructure, weaker lot-matching UI.14/20
COA Accessibility15500+ published COAs on a public Lab Tests page, accessible before purchase with no login required. This is one of the largest public COA archives observed in this market. Buyers can view test results for a product before ordering. Minor deduction for browseable-not-searchable structure.13/15
COA Completeness15Published COAs cover purity (HPLC), net peptide content, sterility, and endotoxin. Four parameters per batch is above average for this market. Mass spectrometry identity confirmation is not explicitly listed in the public testing protocol description. Minor deduction for absence of explicit identity confirmation methodology.12/15
Testing Recency10Site updated July 2026, Lab Tests page active with new products. Testing described as ongoing since 2019 with "most recent and up-to-date test results in the industry." Over 60+ labs tests noted as a current count. Active and demonstrably current.9/10
Policy Transparency5Shipping and returns policy exists at a dedicated URL. FAQ covers storage, shipping time, and reconstitution. Policy specifics on lot-quality incident handling and reship for quality failures are not prominently described in publicly accessible documentation.3/5
Operational Track Record5Founded 2020 with testing dating to 2019. Stated background in biochemistry and peptide sciences since 2012. Active catalog with 30+ SKUs, 5,000+ newsletter subscribers. Multi-year established operation with consistent COA publication track record verifiable through the public archive.3/5
Total80/100
Community Signal
Independent Test Results
Verified Peptides' position as an early adopter of public third-party COA publishing (2019-2020) gives them a longer verifiable testing archive than most competitors. Community members have referenced the Lab Tests page as a credibility signal. Independent community-commissioned blind-buy testing results not identified in public archives as of July 2026.
Community Experience
Generally positive community references for COA transparency. Reputation is primarily built on the public lab archive rather than independent community testing. Some community members note catalog size is narrower than some competitors, focusing on a curated rather than comprehensive approach.
Scoring Notes
The public COA archive is the differentiator
500+ published COAs verifiable with the testing lab is a meaningful commitment. The discipline of publishing every batch result - including any that might underperform - is the signal that separates genuine transparency from marketing. The archive predates this scoring and cannot be retroactively curated, which is itself an authenticity signal.
What would push to a higher High Transparency score
A lot-number-searchable COA interface (rather than product-browseable), explicit mass spectrometry identity confirmation in the testing protocol, and more specific quality-incident policy documentation would strengthen the score further within the High band.
Sources: verifiedpeptides.com (homepage, Lab Tests page, FAQ, shipping policy, terms of use, our company page) · verifiedpeptides.com/lab-reports · verifiedpeptides.com/knowledge-hub. VTS measures process transparency from publicly available materials only. Scored July 2026.