Biomax Peptides makes specific testing claims on its homepage - HPLC and mass spectrometry, 99% purity minimum - and makes them publicly, which puts it ahead of vendors who say nothing. The problem is that nothing behind those claims is verifiable from public materials: no COA archive, no named lab, no batch numbers, and COAs only available upon request rather than pre-purchase. The domain launched December 2024, leaving no community track record to draw on. The score reflects a gap between what is claimed and what a stranger can independently confirm.
| Dimension | Scoring Notes | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Third-Party Testing Practice | The homepage states "HPLC and mass spectrometry verified" as a feature claim. However, no COA is publicly posted anywhere on the site - not on product pages, not in a dedicated lab results section, and not in the footer. The "Certificates of Analysis (COAs) - Available upon request" line confirms testing is claimed but documentation is not proactively shared. Frequency, catalog coverage, and the name of any testing lab are entirely absent from public materials. Credit given for the explicit method claim; significant deduction for no public documentation to confirm it. |
8
/ 30
|
| Batch Traceability & Verification | No lot-matched documentation is publicly accessible. No scannable codes, no COA archive, no lot number search tool. Product pages show no lot or batch identifiers. A buyer has no publicly available mechanism to tie a vial in hand to any specific test result, even after purchase. |
3
/ 20
|
| COA Accessibility | "Available upon request" is explicitly stated on the homepage. This places Biomax in the email-request tier - better than fully absent or account-login-gated, but a stranger cannot access any COA before reaching out to the vendor. No pre-purchase public access to any documentation. Scored at the email-request level per the rubric. |
6
/ 15
|
| COA Completeness | No COA is publicly available to assess directly. The homepage claims HPLC and MS testing - if accurate, that would indicate meaningful completeness. However, unverifiable claims receive near-minimum credit under the rubric. Completeness cannot be confirmed without seeing an actual document. |
3
/ 15
|
| Testing Recency | No dated COAs are publicly visible. Recency of testing relative to currently sold product cannot be assessed. Minimum score for inability to verify. |
2
/ 10
|
| Policy Transparency | Dedicated, publicly accessible Refund & Return and Shipping & Payment pages with specific terms: no returns once shipped, 24-hour window to report damaged or incorrect items, pre-shipment cancellation allowed with a 3.8% cancellation fee, "all sales are final" stated clearly. International shipping terms and USPS responsibility limits also documented. More specific than most vendors at this scoring tier. Near-full score for policy transparency. |
4
/ 5
|
| Operational Track Record | Domain registered December 2024 per independent review sources. Under one year in operation at time of scoring. No community presence found across Reddit, Trustpilot, or peptide forums as of mid-2026. Private WHOIS registration (Domains by Proxy) - operating entity behind the site cannot be independently confirmed from public records. The domain confusion with similarly named sites (biomax.ca, biomaxx.shop) noted by multiple reviewers adds an additional navigation concern but is not directly scored. Minimum score for an operation under one year with no community track record. |
1
/ 5
|