← Back to Methodology
RQS Scoring Log

NAD+

Longevity & Cellular Aging· Human RCT· Scored June 2026· View compound profile →
69 /100
Moderate Evidence
7 dimensions · 100 points total · Methodology by PeptideClear
Dimension Breakdown
DimensionScoring NotesScore
Study Design
A 2026 PRISMA-guided systematic review identified 33 human intervention studies (28 randomized, 5 nonrandomized) on NAD+ precursors through October 2025. Multiple independent RCTs exist, but no single large Phase III trial anchors the field — capped below the maximum.
20 / 25
Sample Size
Individual trials are mostly small (20–95 participants). Cumulative human exposure across 28 RCTs is meaningful for a research peptide-adjacent compound, but no single trial breaks 200 participants.
8 / 20
Replication
NR and NMN's effect on raising circulating NAD+ has been replicated across independent academic groups internationally, most recently in a head-to-head precursor comparison published in Nature Metabolism (January 2026).
15 / 20
Journal Impact Factor
The 2026 precursor-comparison study was published in Nature Metabolism (IF ~17). Other studies span Aging Cell, Nutrients, and Journal of Clinical Investigation — solid mid-to-high tier journals.
12 / 15
Funding Independence
Mixed funding profile. The 2026 Nature Metabolism precursor comparison was Nestlé Health Science-funded; a meaningful academic and NIH-adjacent presence elsewhere in the literature keeps this above pure industry dominance.
7 / 10
Population Diversity
Trials span a range of ages and some international cohorts (US, Japan, China, Switzerland), but most precursor RCTs concentrate on healthy or condition-specific adult populations — moderate, not broad, diversity.
3 / 5
Researcher h-Index
Researchers leading the 2026 Nature Metabolism comparison and related precursor work have solid, established academic profiles, though not uniformly elite across the full NAD+ literature.
4 / 5