← Back to Methodology
RQS Scoring Log

Ipamorelin

Growth Hormone· Animal Only· Scored May 2026· View compound profile →
35 /100
Weak Evidence
7 dimensions · 100 points total · Methodology by PeptideClear
Dimension Breakdown
DimensionScoring NotesScore
Study Design
Essentially all meaningful efficacy data is animal (rat, pig) studies. Some Phase I human PK/PD safety studies exist but no published human efficacy RCTs. Animal only score applies.
5 / 25
Sample Size
No human efficacy participants to count. Animal study cohorts are typically small (10-20 animals per group).
4 / 20
Replication
Animal studies have been replicated across multiple independent research groups for GH pulse amplitude. Consistent animal findings, but not human data.
10 / 20
Journal Impact Factor
Some publications in Endocrinology (IF ~4.5) and Growth Hormone & IGF Research. Reasonable journal quality for the compound class.
8 / 15
Funding Independence
Mix of academic and Novo Nordisk-affiliated research (ipamorelin originated in Novo pipeline). Some industry shadow in early research.
4 / 10
Population Diversity
Animal only — not applicable.
1 / 5
Researcher h-Index
Some lead researchers have strong profiles. Jens-Otto Clemmensen and Novo Nordisk scientists have solid h-Indexes. Capped at 5.
3 / 5
Animal Only Note
This score reflects evidence in humans. Animal and in vitro evidence may be substantially stronger than the score suggests — this compound has not yet been studied in human trials.