← Back to Methodology
RQS Scoring Log

AOD-9604

Metabolic· Observational· Scored May 2026· View compound profile →
33 /100
Weak Evidence
7 dimensions · 100 points total · Methodology by PeptideClear
Dimension Breakdown
DimensionScoring NotesScore
Study Design
Human Phase IIb/III trials were conducted (METAOD study series) but failed to demonstrate significant weight loss vs placebo in larger trials. FDA GRAS status for food use. No RCT success for primary indication.
5 / 25
Sample Size
METAOD trials enrolled several hundred participants but multiple trials were stopped or showed null results. Sample sizes were adequate; evidence quality was not.
4 / 20
Replication
Primary developer (Metabolic Pharmaceuticals, Australia) conducted all meaningful trials — single institution essentially. No successful independent replication.
5 / 20
Journal Impact Factor
Most publications in lower-tier journals (IF 1-2 range) or conference abstracts. No A-journal primary outcomes.
8 / 15
Funding Independence
Almost exclusively Metabolic Pharmaceuticals funded. Developer-funded with no independent confirmation of efficacy.
7 / 10
Population Diversity
Phase IIb enrolled predominantly Australian/Western populations. Narrow base. Score reflects limited data overall.
1 / 5
Researcher h-Index
Lead researchers from Metabolic Pharmaceuticals; h-Indexes not publicly prominent in literature. Conservative score.
3 / 5